Building an adaptive public service — Peter Ong

Building an adaptive public service — Peter Ong


Good Afternoon

Tan Sri Mohd. Sidek Hassan, Chief Secretary to the Government of Malaysia

Dr Hamidin Abd Hamid, CEO Razak School of Government

Ladies and Gentlemen

Introduction

1. I am truly honoured to be invited to speak at this Inaugural Chief Secretary Lecture. When my good friend and colleague, Tan Sri Mohd. Sidek approached me, I was initially hesitant. The Singapore Public Service is much smaller and less complex compared to your civil service. Certainly, some of our experiences as a city-state would not be directly transferable to your context of a federal, state and local government system.

2. The Singapore Public Service had the privilege of hearing Tan Sri’s views when he spoke as our Civil Service College Distinguished Speaker in February last year. We were able to distil many important lessons from his views on the challenges that the Malaysian Civil Service faced. Hence, I accepted Tan Sri’s invitation as I view this lecture as a continuation of the discourse between our two Civil Services. There is value in this exchange of insights on what are needed to build a public service that is responsive to the needs of our citizens, and that embraces the wider global trends like globalisation, technology and shifting geo-strategic developments. In short, we both face the common challenge of building an adaptive public service that will prepare us for the future.

3. We certainly do not have all the answers to the challenges we face in our respective public services. In fact, in today’s fast-paced, changing world where tomorrow can be radically different from today, we may not be able to hold on to established approaches that worked well in the past, but which may not be as appropriate or relevant going forward.

4. If we think about it, a mere 15 years ago, the internet was only just being introduced to the world. And about six years ago, Facebook was virtually unknown.

5. Today, you can speak to your phone, and it talks back to you. With the iPhone 4S, you can ask a question and Siri will have a response. In this slide, Siri is responding to a question about Women. And here, the response to the request to call for an ambulance is not quite what was expected. But, I am sure it is only a matter of time before Siri will be able to call the ambulance and even direct the ambulance to the site of the accident all on its own. And who knows, in a matter of time, Siri could be the one sending the appeal to the Road Transport Department (JPJ) or Town Councils for the parking saman.

6. In this new world of pervasive change, uncertainties and complexity, how do we prepare our civil service so that we are always able and ready to address the challenges that come our way?

A complex world, a changing Singapore

7. As a small country with an open economy, Singapore faces an increasingly challenging global environment. The Eurozone financial situation continues to unfold, with increasing uncertainty surrounding not just Greece, but larger Eurozone countries like Spain and Italy. Just this month, US President Barack Obama announced that the Asia Pacific is key to the future and the US will station more troops in Australia.

8. Following the Arab Spring uprisings in the Middle East, the world watched Colonel Gaddafi’s regime in Libya being overthrown. We also watched as the Occupy Wall Street movement and its spinoffs unfold simultaneously around the world. Tan Sri Sidek reminded me recently that even Einstein’s Law of Relativity, which many scientists have taken for granted, is now being challenged.

9. I am not sure if this is the result of the sentimentality of growing older, but when I joined the public service, public policy issues seemed more straightforward. Our priorities were clear. First and foremost, we needed to meet Singaporean’s basic needs such as ensuring security, providing jobs, decent public housing and basic education.

10. I was told by my superiors to analyse the issues systematically, emulate best practices from developed countries, and find pragmatic solutions that we could sustain financially. If you did these three things well, you would be fine.

11. However, things are not quite as straightforward today. In Singapore, not only do our public officers grapple with the wider global forces, we are also seeing the very nature of the relationship between the State and the citizen change. Today, our citizens are asking for a different type of relationship with government. Singaporeans are telling us that they want to be heard and they want, more than ever before, to be included in shaping Singapore’s future. We welcome our citizens’ call for better engagement and inclusion. But is the Singapore Public Service ready for this change? Will we be able to live up to Singaporeans’ expectations? Our response to these challenges will determine if we can be an adaptive public service worthy of Singapore and Singaporeans.

A public service worthy of Singapore: Ready for change and ready to change

12. It was for the reason that the Singapore public service needed to change in time for the future and to adapt that we launched our mass movement for change in 1995, called Public Service for the 21st Century, or PS21.

The PS21 Movement

13.With the theme of “Being in Time for the Future”, the PS21 movement sought to transform the Singapore Public Service to (i) Anticipate Change, (ii) Welcome Change and (iii) Execute Change.

14. We believed that to sustain such large scale change management in bureaucracies, we needed grassroots initiatives that are driven bottom-up, generated by the enthusiasm, momentum and stamina of people on the ground. Put very simply, everyone at every level should be imbued with the belief that “Everyone is an Activist for Change”.

The Evolution of PS21 15

To do this, we focused PS21 on four functional areas:

i. Excellence through Continuous Enterprise and Learning (or ExCEL) focused on encouraging officers to contribute ideas that could improve processes or service delivery in their respective areas of work. Its key initiatives included the Staff Suggestion Scheme (SSS), Work Improvement Teams (WITS) and the training of public officers.

ii. Organisational Review referred to the transformation of the Singapore Public Service through structural and strategic innovations. This included the streamlining of procedures, cutting red-tape, and applying information technology and management tools.

iii. Quality Service meant delighting customers. This was a commitment to Courtesy, Accessibility, Responsiveness and Effectiveness (or CARE for short) in the delivery of services to the public as well as to fellow public officers who rely on collaboration within the Civil Service to perform their duties well.

iv. Staff Well-being, which included looking after, energising and engaging staff so that they felt valued for their contributions, as well as prepared and committed to do their best.

16. While some of these activities were already being practised from the early 1980s as part of our National Productivity movement, they were never organised for a broad reach or extensive participation for the entire Civil Service. Getting PS21 going, as you can imagine, was no easy feat. For example, quality service and the notion of delighting customers were quite foreign concepts. We all know that unlike in the private sector, the public service is a monopoly. If a citizen is dissatisfied with our passport application process, he or she cannot just find another service provider.

17. Hence, it took some convincing to let our staff understand that we needed to approach public service from a new standpoint.

18. So to encourage public officers to generate ideas to improve the way they worked, we mandated that everyone should achieve a target of four suggestions a year and participate in at least one Work Improvement Team project.

19. These processes were useful. They got officers into the practice of always thinking about how they can do their work better. It also led to a blossoming of good ideas for implementation. As a recent example, an officer from the National Environment Agency asked himself whether a miniature microscope which jewellers use to examine the authenticity of gems, could be used to identify mosquito larvae. He and his colleagues went on to modify a microscope which allowed it to be attached to a camera phone, something that all of us would have. Now, officers can take a picture of these larva samples using their smart phones through the microscope attached. They send the photos back to the office for identification without having to store and transport any samples back. This frees up officers’ time to deploy more mosquito traps around the housing estates. This idea led to a 46 per cent productivity gain. This simple, but inspired, innovation is an example of how PS21 has been able to encourage our officers to innovate within their own functional areas of work.

20. Nasir, from the NEA, is an example of a change agent. We hope for many more like him in the Singapore Public Service to help us realise the vision of an exceptional Public Service.

21. Despite the many successes, we found that after some time, the PS21 processes took on a life of their own, one that we had never intended. For example, to ensure that we took SSS and WITS seriously, we required ministries and agencies to rigorously track the statistics, such as the number of suggestions submitted per month. An exercise that was meant to encourage turned into a perceived policing exercise. The target of four suggestions became an end in itself and not a means to an end.

22. On top of this, the numerous programmes and initiatives that arose out of PS21 created some confusion. For example, PS21 began associated with initiatives such as the Cut Red Tape movement, Pro-enterprise Panel, Zero-in Panel which all aimed to remove unnecessary red-tape, rules and regulations.

23. Hence, in 2008, we took the opportunity to review, reflect and refresh the movement. Although the movement had undergone previous changes, in terms of the committees and structure which supported it, the review in 2008 signalled a philosophical change in its approach in three areas:

• First, PS21 is about Change and Innovation — PS21 seeks to harness the creativity and diversity of the Public Service, reinforce the spirit of continuous improvement, experiment with new ideas, and make training and learning a way of life for our officers.

• Second, everyone is an Agent of Change — While every public officer was to continue being actively involved in change, we de-emphasised the collation of statistics concerning SSS and WITS. Instead, we emphasised that improvements can be both big and small, and can take place in both policy and operational functions. On top of this, they can be proposed and executed by both individuals or groups and, most importantly, can touch on any area of work.

• Third, PS21 builds a Public Service Worthy of Singapore — The future calls for a Public Service that is responsive, flexible and innovative. We believe that such a public service would help to maintain Singapore’s competitive advantage and contribute directly to the success of Singapore.

24. These changes meant a PS21 movement driven less from the centre, but more from the level where it works best — the ministry or agency level. So rather than the prescriptive approach when the movement started, Permanent Secretaries or CEOs could work out what his/her priorities are, and what he/she wants PS21 to achieve for the organisation.

25. This, in turn, meant changing the way we measured PS21. Instead of continuing with statistics for SSS and WITS, agencies were instead asked to submit qualitative reports on the state of PS21 so that we can still assess the health of the organisation centrally.

26. The only way any movement, more importantly a change movement, can continue to stay relevant is if it constantly refreshes itself to adapt to the changing environment. Hence, PS21 today is quite different from when it was launched 16 years ago. But one thing is clear — while the form and manifestations of PS21 have evolved over time, the spirit of embracing change in preparation for the future remains.

27. Looking forward, what then are the necessary adaptations to such a mass movement that is itself dedicated to change? I believe that the key driving force will, indeed, be the changes in the citizenry we serve — our own people; their profile and aspirations, and these in turn will alter the nature of the relationship between State and citizens. The Singapore Public Service will need to re-think the way we formulate and implement policies and deliver public services in three key areas: (i) the need for greater public engagement, (ii) the need to formulate policies and deliver public services with more empathy and (iii) the need to keep preparing for the uncertain and unpredictable future.

• Greater Public Engagement — As I mentioned earlier, Singapore citizens are calling for better engagement and for government to be more inclusive. The truth of the matter is that the government does not have a monopoly of ideas; and if policies are co-created through active participation of the citizenry, it will generate more buy-in and ownership from the ground. Hence, our public officers must be willing to seek more diverse views from people from all walks of life and seize the opportunity to collaborate to generate ideas and potential solutions.

Obviously, not all policies are amenable for public engagement and we should have the wisdom to do what we can in areas that will benefit from such engagement.

• Policy Formulation and Service Delivery with More Empathy — The Singapore Public Service is known for its pragmatism. We are very familiar with crafting policies using our heads. But I believe there is room for us, in the Singapore Public Service, to formulate and implement policies with more heart, or more from the citizen’s perspective, rather than from the perspective of the agency implementing the policy.

‘Service Delivery with More Empathy’ may thus require us to move away from a “one-size-fits-all” approach, which leaves no doubt that we are impartial and fair in our dealings, to one where we seek to cater to the growing diversity of the population and the specific circumstances of individuals.

• Preparing for Uncertain and Unpredictable Future — This remains an enduring theme of PS21. The Public Service must anticipate and prepare for emerging risks and opportunities that stem from both global forces and local trends. We need to think about the challenges that Singapore could face in the longer-term, and develop policy options in advance, so that we can move decisively and effectively when we need to.

The leadership imperative

28. Any successful change management story will not be complete without underscoring the imperative for strong leadership.

29. A strong and effective public service requires strong and effective leadership. However, it is in this new era of complexity and uncertainty that the role of leaders at all levels within the public service becomes even more crucial.

30. There is an urgent need to groom current and future generations of leaders to follow in the same purpose and direction. Hence, we are constantly trying out new ways to identify, engage and groom the younger generation to become future leaders. Let me share with you four key areas of how we are doing so.

31. First, we promote developmental relationships. We create opportunities for senior public service leaders to mentor or coach junior public service leaders. I have a rule of thumb that if a leader is not spending up to 30% of his time on mentoring, developing and nurturing younger officers, he is not spending enough time on the most important asset in the organisation.

32. Second, leaders are identified among our public officers by assessing their potential and by appraising their performance at all stages in their careers. Some of you may be aware that the Singapore Public Service uses a system where we identity the Current Estimated Potential (CEP) or the estimated grade that an officer is deemed to be able to reach at the point of retirement.

33. This system allows us to identify those officers whom we believe have the potential to fulfil senior positions early on in their career, so as to give us sufficient opportunity to plan for their development. However, it takes a lot of resources and effort on our part to familiarise ourselves with each and every officer and their work performance so that we are able to make as accurate an assessment as we can about their potential to be the leaders of the future. The appraisal process is thus a lengthy one, which requires the full commitment of the entire organisation.

34. Third, young leaders assessed with high potential are selected for milestone training programmes at key points in their careers. These include milestones such as when they first take on supervisory duties, when they start leading their own departments and when they take on leadership of agencies.

35. Fourth, we place strong emphasis on leadership renewal. To ensure that there is a constant flow of new and fresh ideas, our public sector leaders have a fixed tenure of service. Once an officer is promoted into a public sector leadership position such as Deputy Secretary, they are bound by a fixed tenure of 10 years. The underlying premise of this approach is that while there will always be a need for experience, it may be our younger leaders who will have fresher insights. It is also more likely, that they will have more current and innovative ideas to deal with issues that confront us today.

36. While this policy was implemented to stem the flow of talent out of the civil service, I believe that this renewal of leadership will be key to how Singapore will be able to adapt in this complex and uncertain new world.

Leading Organisational and Institutional Transformation

37. From developing people as individuals, let me now move on to another equally important role for leaders, and that is to engender change in an organisation, by putting in place processes, systems and structures that will transform the organisational culture and behaviour even beyond the tenure of the leader.

38. To do this, leaders must also grasp the organisational constraints and bottlenecks that might impede change, and overcome these challenges to prepare the organisation for future challenges.

39. The Internal Revenue Authority Singapore (or IRAS) is an example of an organisation that had benefited from leaders, at all levels, who have committed to transforming IRAS. It has since grown from strength-to-strength and now serves as a guiding pillar for the rest of the civil service.

40. Filing taxes, depending on where you come from, is really nothing to joke about. Instead it is a stressful time of trying to ensure that you have declared all your income correctly and recorded all your taxable claims and expenditures for filing. In fact, because many tax systems are very complicated, many resort to hiring professional accountants to handle their taxes. Fortunately for us in Singapore, filing and paying taxes is a stress free activity.

41. IRAS’s journey began with taxpayers’ records stored in filing bays that were fenced up by ceiling-high wire mesh. It was not only the physical conditions which were in need of an overhaul. Work processes, which entailed officers ploughing through pages of records to pick up relevant items and manually calculating the tax payable in each case, also needed a revamp.

42. Given that the most important interaction with taxpayers starts with tax filing, they began questioning the way tax returns were examined and whether we could improve the tax filing process. Questioning the status quo led IRAS to review its entire work process. They first did away with the mundane processes, then started e-filing for taxpayers and subsequently made tax filing a non-event by working with employers to submit an employee’s earned income directly to IRAS, starting with the biggest employer – the Singapore Civil Service.

43. The latest service innovation by IRAS is No-Filing. Tax-payers, whose employers are already submitting the required information to IRAS, will not even need to file taxes each year as long as they have no additional income to declare or changes to their relief claims. And if you do need to make any changes to your relief claims, these can be filed electronically.

44. As a result, IRAS, which is in an unenviable position of having customers who do not particularly relish dealing with the taxman, has managed to minimise the administrative hassle for the public through the use of technology and has kept transforming itself.

Enduring values for the Singapore public service

45. Before I end this lecture, I would like to share the importance of enduring values for the Public Service. The core values of the Singapore Public Service are Integrity, Service and Excellence.

46. These values have always been the backbone of our Public Service philosophy and ethos. They are not merely slogans we shout out. We expect that our leaders lead by example and demonstrate these values regardless of the situation they are faced with. And they serve as our guiding stars during periods of change and uncertainty.

47. I’ve shared with you three key areas which the Singapore Public Service has focused its attention on. One was how the public service must always stay nimble and be ready to change. The second was that leaders have an obligation to develop people and to also lead institutional and organisational transformation to ensure resilience in this increasingly complex world. And third was the importance of keeping to our core values to enable us to cope in times of change and uncertainty.

48. While I feel that these areas require our present attention, I also believe that it is important for us to remind ourselves that this journey of governance we are on is and will never be easy. It is a journey which requires tremendous stamina and perseverance. The key is being adaptable.

Conclusion: The power of education

49. Finally, we must never lose faith in the power of education in encouraging our leaders to stay adaptive. This is where the Razak School of Government plays a pivotal role.

50. The Razak School’s intention to be a platform for dialogue, knowledge sharing and synergistic collaboration will prove to be an asset to the Malaysian public sector. It can be the incubator for many ideas for change, and an exchange for leaders to constantly come back to refresh themselves along this journey of governance.

51. I leave you with another slide showing Siri’s response to a question. Siri is asked, “What is your birthday?” Its response, “I came into existence gradually”.

52. In 2005, during a commencement address in Stanford, Steve Jobs shared about the time he had spent taking random classes, after formally dropping out of school. He said, “You can’t connect the dots looking forward you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust in something: your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. Because believing that the dots will connect down the road will give you the confidence to follow your heart, even when it leads you off the well worn path.”

53. I’m sure the late Steve Jobs, when he had dropped out of school, would never have expected the type of impact he would have on the world. He followed his instincts and pushed himself and others to realise ideas which changed the world. While it may seem as if he had changed the world overnight, as Siri’s response suggests, it wasn’t the case. Instead, it took patience, perseverance and a team of people working hard over an extended period of time to realise his vision.

54. Not all of our people are going to be as enlightened or as visionary as Steve Jobs. Public Sector learning institutions such as the Razak School of Government and Civil Service College in Singapore, play an important role in helping our people to ‘connect the dots’. By focusing regularly on our people, helping them to appreciate the importance for change and guiding them in little improvements every day, our Public Services would be able to achieve sustained success no matter what challenges tomorrow may bring.

* Peter Ong is the head of the civil service in Singapore.

* This was the inaugural lecture of the Chief Secretary Forum in Kuala Lumpur on November 30, 2011.

Mencari Calon Sesuai Untok PEKEMBAR Sempena GE

Mungkin ini adalah candidate?



1. Sekarang sibok sangat pekan Kuala Lumpor ni. Ramai seperti anak puyu mengerumuni pekan Kuala Lumpor. Lenih-lebih lagi di kawasan Jalan Raja Laut, Jalan Ipoh, Jalan Chow Kit, Jalan Thambosamy, Jalan Tiong Nam dan sekitar-sekitarlah. Apahal aku nak sebut semua jalan ni haha.

2. Terbelangsong la ni, sebuah perhimpunan politik Melayu terbesar di dunia. Tak de lagi dah yang boleh thayng perhimpunan ini. Perhimpunan Agung UMNO 2011. Walaupun tiada pemilihan parti namun suasana sentiasa panas dengan macam-macam beraneka warna kelaku dan situasi di PWTC itu. izinkan aku menggunakan kata PEKEMBAR sebagai ganti UMNO sebagai mendokong bahasa kebangsaan yang diperjuangkan juga oleh parti ini.

3. Bermulanya sayap, tiada sayap lain yang menjadi tumpuan. Sayap Wanita kerana isu Lemu NFC yang kononnya ada kaitan dengan Ketua Sayap Wanita Pekembar (KSWP). Tak mau sebut nama sebab panjang bersalutasi. Cukop dgn KSWP. Bukan KWSP. Agak emosi KSWP semasa sidang akhbar beliau. Beliau tak akan sentuh pasai Lemu NFC cuma sedikit words from sponsor akan diberikan masa ucapan beliau. Matang. Namun, aku lihat agak sebaliknya dalam ucapan betul beliau. KSWP , aku lihat dan dengar emosi-emosi dan sedikit personal dalam ucapan berkenaan. Orang-orang keliling dah berpandangan bahawa kalau tidak emolatah berlebihan, lebih matang dilihat. Jadi dimana tiada kena mengena dalam isu Lemu NFC ni, bilang mereka. Nak dijadikan kuah tambah, KSWP suruh Presiden PKR letak jawatan. Nah, sekali lagi orang ramai pening. Sekarang ni, ramai yang rasa KSWP berundur akibat isu melanda. Begitu pandangan mereka.

4. Sunggoh muhong menyataan ramai tak suka beliau balik ke kabinet. Alasan mereka, kalah. Lantik sahaja MP wanita yang ada. Ini dilantik pula jadi senator dan memegang menteri penuh. Dengki sangat mereka ini dengan KSWP. Dah mendapat kepercayaan, ok la tu. Tapi golongan yang nak panjat ke puncak kuasa ni lain pikirannya. Isu Lemu NFC ni hanya semata-semata untuk jatuhkan beliau. Dengki la hgpa ni. Sambong dengan kes kondo bagai. Tak salah pun beli kondo. ROI nya bagus. Hartanah bukan? Alah bisnis lain pun begitu juga. Venture banyak saluran untuk kepentingan utana apa nak salah nya? Saja ja orang dengki kat dia tuhhhh.

5 Popular pula istilah winnable candidate. Bila disebut oleh Timbalan Presiden dan Presiden, dah semua membahas winnable candidate. trend sunggoh trend. Sebenarnya kisah winnable candidate ni dah berawal 3 bulan seblum GE2008. dah wujud pun konsep ni. Mungkin istilah ini belum keluar. Pekembar ni ramai winnable candidate. Mudah berdamping. Cuma sebab budaya gotong royong dah berkurangan dalam Pekembar, maka winnable candidate tu jadi kurang sikit. Sebab? Grass root biasa sangat dengan benda free. Maknanya huluuurrr adalah wajib. Mengenangkan modai yang tidak jenuh maka kuantiti winnable candidate jadi berkurangan. Bimbang menjadi kayapble candidate. Menang belom tentu, kayap hampir tentu.

6. Tak kurang juga yang dah 500 tahun jadi MP dan ADUN tak reti-reti nak bagi jalan kat orang lain. Alasan agenda belum selesai. Betul jgak. Yang ni payah sikit. Selagi set purba ni tak sedar-sedar kepurbaan mereka, payah winnable candidate nak surface. Kadang-kadang hairan jugak dengan prehistoric candidate ini. Apala yang nak hambat lagi. Pi la lawan jadi candidate Tok Siak ka ok la jugak. Ni dok tak mau turun. Kadang-kadang mcm ada korelasi pulak antara umor 60 tahun perkhidmatan dengan kepurbaan candidate ini. Tak nak bagi peluang. Iklim politik dah trouble. Dah berbelah bagi. Winnable candidate pun seriau nak sua muka. Yang purba boleh jadi liabiliti kalau sambung term. Buat sakit kepala MT sahaja.

7 Seperti biasa, misti ada golongan yang memuja muji boss. Ini biasa. Mana-mana perkara pun misti ada. Yang ni kita boleh letak dalam kumpulan candidate wannabe. Aku mau jadi calon. Aku mau jadi calon. Kena up lebeh la sikit kan? Retorik mau baguss, gempaq mau steady dalam bahas. Akai pantun gurindam ni tahap penyeri mejelis ja. Ada juga yang terlepas masok dalam senarai awal untuk jadi calon dari golongan wannabe ini. Apa pun, rezeki Allah semua bagi. Baik prehistoric, winnable, kayapble atau wannabe candidate. Cuma jangan dok tibai orang luar. Boleh dicemuih oleh mereka. Tibai dalam rumah dulu. Barulah steady.

8 PREHISTORIC-WINNABLE-KAYAPBLE-WANNABE : Selamat melobi. Jangan pulak lupa berjuang untuk siapa. Kot la dok kalut untuk diri sendiri ja lebeh keh...keh...keh

Soalan berkaitan : Lagu mana nak tahu dalam sekumpulan lemu, lemu susu ok. Bukan lemu daging. Ok back to question. NAK TAHU LEMU MANA PALING MANYAK SUSU? Sila jawab. Sekian terima kasih.

Hattan, Zubir dan Ogy

Saja nak boh sebab aku kadang-kadang lucu dengan keloratan wartawan hiburan yang bernama Zubir dan kesentapan seorang makcik yang mengaku dulu mulut dia paling lazer. Keh keh keh. Cuma aku harap wartawan jangan hiburankan dunia sukan. Nampak lagi bangang ja. Nampak sangat dunia hiburan tu dah kayu tahapnya. Kalau nak begosip pun tak boleh ke cari time yang tomakninah sikit. Time nak game ada je benda nak timbul. Lemu NFC jugak korang kadang-kadang ...


Hattan Tinggal Pesan Panas Buat Zubir

“Kau jangan tanya salah soalan, aku sekarang memang tengah panas orang tulis macam macam cerita,” ujar Hattan membuka perbualan.

Lantas ligat bagai lipas kudung otak kami mengatur kembali soalan yang ingin kami ajukan berkaitan gossip negatif yang melanda rumahtangga Hattan & isteri, Farah.

Dan, Hattan menjawab penuh tenang, “Aku tengah drive ke KLIA untuk jemput isteri aku balik dari Hong Kong — memang tiada isu dan kau ada baca tulisan Zubir Berita Harian?”

“Dia tulis aku ceraikan isteri aku dengan talak tiga — suka hati dia — walaupun tidak menyebut nama aku, tetapi aku tahu dia tujukan pada aku,” Hattan membuka bicara tentang Zubir.

Hattan juga berkata yang wartawan kontroversi tersebut ada menulis tentang diri’nya yang sekali lagi tidak di’undang ke majlis perkahwinan Hattan & Farah.

“Aku tidak panggil dia seorang sahaja — wartawan lain semua aku beritahu — dia siapa lagi pun, bukan Anuar Zain, sudahlah gemuk pendek ada hati mahu di sanjung sanjung. Kau tulis apa aku cakap,” ujar Hattan lagi.


Bukan Ogy Aibkan Diri Sendiri Ke?

Semua tahu bahawa Fauziah Ahmad Daud atau Ogy hangin satu badan dengan Johan Raja Lawak yang menjadi pasangan pengacaranya di Festival Filem Malaysia ke-24 baru-baru ini.

Dengarnya Ogy sampai nak ambik tindakan mahkamah ke atas Johan kerana mempersendakan dirinya.

Yang kita semua tahu selama ni Ogy yang mulut takda insuran. Malukan orang selamba dia aje. Ingat kes Azwan Ali dan Ziana Zain?

Bila kena balik kat batang idung sendiri, bukan main melenting.

Nak muntah pun ada jugak dengan sikap Ogy. Sedarlah diri tu sendiri Ogy.

Bila buku bertemu ruas…kalah…nak saman orang pulak.

Salah satu yang Ogy tak puas hati ialah kononnya Johan mengaibkan dirinya di hadapan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin yang merupakan tetamu kehormat malam itu.

Iye ke…atau Ogy yang memalukan diri sendiri sebenarnya?

Rasa malu yang amat dengan gaya Ogy yang bukan sahaja bertudung tapi sudah berumur.

Kena sebut berumur dan tak boleh sebut tua, kang dengan penulis pun kena saman silap hari.

Rasanya…tak perlulah Ogy nak saman Johan. Pergi mahkamah nanti Ogy akan dimalukan dengan lebih teruk oleh peguam Johan silap hari.

Betapa huduhnya Ogy terkinja-kinja atas pentas.

Dia membawa aib ke atas dirinya sendiri.

Tak boleh ke bersikap profesional sikit sejajar dengan status artis senior yang cuba dijual Ogy ke serata Malaya?

Perangai lagi teruk daripada beruk kena belacan…nak kata orang lain pulak yang over.

Johan pun ada tersasar jugak..tapi kalau Ogy bersikap matang sikit malam tu, mungkin tak keluar la dialog-dialog yang over.

Silap memang di bahu Ogy. Buat apa nak melatah?

Terang lagi bersuluh Ogy yang mengaibkan dirinya sendiri.

Dan kalau ada rasa tak puas hati pun, bersemuka ajelah dengan Johan. Bermaaf-maafan lebih baik la daripada pergi mahkamah.

Double TAP - Tirani oleh MINORITI. Satu pulasan EXIT POLICY SBPA

Sebelum ini aku pernah pos artikel ini.

Kunta Kinte - Awasi tirani oleh minoriti 29-7-2011
2011/07/29
MINGGU ini Kunta Kinte nak bincang sikit pasal demokrasi dan apa yang dalam bahasa Inggeris disebut ‘tyranny of the majority’.

Macam Kunta Kinte dah banyak kali sebut, demokrasi adalah kerajaan oleh rakyat di mana bilangan yang teramai perintah.
Dari sudut etimologi atau asal usul pembentukan bahasa, demokrasi adalah daripada bahasa Perancis, démocratie, Latin democratia dan Greek (Yunani) demokrati. Demos dalam bahasa Yunani bererti orang ramai atau rakyat jelata dan krati bermaksud pemerintahan atau pentadbiran. Jadi, demokrasi adalah pemerintahan oleh rakyat jelata, sama ada secara langsung atau melalui wakil.

1. Nampak gayanya dah berlaku lagi. Kali ini bukan kepada bangsa tetapi kepada perkhidmatan awam pula. Bole setuju ke? Aku rasa macam setuju juga. Dalam konteks perkhidmatan awam, sudash tentunya penjawat awam adalah majoriti. Walaupun ada jawatan kontrak dan sebagainya, maseh dianggap termasuk dalam perkhidmatan awam. Pegawai khas 14 orang atau 50 orang pun masih awam kerana mengambil post-post dalam perjawatan sedia ada. Biar senget buat kerja, janji pegawai khas ada 28 orang.

2. Dalam usaha mengecilkan perkhidmatan awam, tidak sepatutnya pula melayan sebahagian karenah daripada orang luar yang tiba-tiba bernafsu dan makin pandai bermain politik untuk mendapat peluang dalam perkhidmatan awam. Sepatutnya didahulukan yang sedia ada. Ramai yang capable nak buat kerja. Ramai aje.

3. Kadang-kadang dalam perlaksanaan road map atau learning curve seseorang anggota seolah tidak sesuai dengan bidang yang ada. Contoh, seorang anggota kerja dalam bidang pengurusan kesehatan, ambil master dan Phd dalam disiplin yang sama tiba-tiba dihantar ke bidang keselamatan. Tidak lah ngam sangat.

4. Berbalik kepada kronoloji melulu aku sebelum ini, seolah-olah cendikiawan swasta diberi sedikit peluang tapi besar untuk menyelinap dalam perkhidmatan awam atas kapasiti muda, cerdik, up to date dan no nonsense type. Kenapa diberi peluang besar kepada golongan minoriti ini. Post hebat-hebat nak ambil. Post 41 ke laut tak nak.

5. Sad to say, orang Melayu dua kali dilihat kena tindas oleh grup minoriti. Satu melalui minoriti kelompok bangsa dan kedua melalui minoriti kelompok swasta. DOUBLE TAP. Apa nak buat dah Melayu jadi majoriti dalam kedua-duanya. Amat dibimbangi sekiranya protes kembali berlaku seperti 2008 dalam tahun 2013 pula. Tak tau la siapa jadi duri akibat protes penjawat awam pada 2008. Harap-harap jangan khalayak ditanam akan persepsi bahawa duri yang sama menjadi punca untuk protes 2013. vulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticusvulpes gallus domesticus

6. Yang Melayu pun sibuk nak pinda AUKU, mengaji ke laut. Tak dapat kerja marah kerajaan. Sibuk nak bedebat. Kerja kurang jalan. Debat ja pandai. Berimpun pun cukup cekap.

Main Ayam

Ayam ni bukan ayam orang, ayam makan padi tapi jambui rumput. Mudah didapati di kawasan batas bendang dan padang bola.

Semasa kecik dulu, dalam lingkungan umur 9-11 tahun, aku selalu main benda ni. Biasanya sebelum pi mengaji atau main-main sekeliing kampung di petang hari. Main ayam ini sempoi sahaja sebenarnya. Adu sapa dapat putuskan jambui rumput itu. Putus maknanya carilah ayam lain. Seronoknya ada yang kecoh. Main ayam yang dah nak kering tangkainya. Liatla nak putus. Ada lagi satu, ayam kematu. Ini kepala rumpuit yang belum sempat tumbuh jambui. Power ooo yang ni hahhah. Best main benda ni. Yang digambar di bawah, aku ternampak di kawasan rumah. Cubalah bermain dengan dakkecik. Tapi apa dia tahu dengan umur 2 tahun lebih tu kehehe

EXIT POLICY SBPA

Jawatan JUSA, Turus akan diubah

KUALA LUMPUR 27 Nov. - Skim jawatan utama atau premier perkhidmatan awam, peringkat JUSA dan Turus akan diubah suai bagi membolehkan kepakaran luar termasuk dari sektor swasta diambil masuk.

Dengan cadangan itu bermakna, mana-mana pekerja sektor swasta yang berminat mengisi Jawatan Utama Sektor Awam (JUSA) dari JUSA C dan sehingga ke peringkat tonggak, Turus boleh berbuat demikian.

Utusan Malaysia difahamkan, jawatan yang terbabit boleh menjangkaui sehingga ke kedudukan Ketua Setiausaha Negara (KSN) dan Ketua Setiausaha (KSU) sesebuah kementerian.

KSU yang berada dalam kategori JUSA tertinggi dan Turus adalah sama seperti Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif (CEO) sebuah syarikat korporat.

Bagaimanapun tidak diketahui sama ada pengisian jawatan-jawatan tertinggi itu akan mengambil kira kouta berdasarkan kaum.

Satu taklimat kepada pegawai-pegawai peringkat utama dan ke atas telah dilakukan oleh pihak Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam (JPA) minggu lalu.

Difahamkan ia adalah sebahagian daripada program transformasi dalam perkhidmatan awam. Di bawah program itu Skim Saraan Malaysia (SSM) akan diganti dengan Skim Saraan Baru Perkhidmatan Awam (SSBPA).

Menurut satu sumber, di bawah sistem baru itu, kemasukan kakitangan untuk kategori itu akan dilakukan secara lateral.

Buat sementara, difahamkan lima buah kementerian telah dikenal pasti untuk dilaksanakan kaedah itu.

Dalam pada itu, Utusan juga difahamkan di bawah program itu, kesemua KSU akan dikehendaki meletak jawatan dan memohon semula secara kontrak. Prestasi mereka akan dinilai dalam tempoh kontrak tersebut.

Dalam proses ini, menurut sumber itu, pihak dalam dan luar daripada perkhidmatan awam juga boleh memohon untuk mengisi jawatan tersebut.


Nanti aku pulas...

Ini berdasarkan kronoloji melulu. Sekiranya nak boh kuah, sila komen :




1. Semasa rangka masa 1993-1997, ekonomi sungguh boom!!!! Lebih-lebih lagi antara 1996-1997. Masa itu, pasaran kerja sunggoh menyeronokkan. Kan? Untuk lepasan izazah senang-senang dapat RM2200. Cikai sangat la tu. Kerja 7E pun boleh pegang RM1300 walaupun berisiko merasa sejuk besi di leher kalau berkesempatan. Mewah. Keluar kereta sepetik jari. Kerajaan? Pilehan pengabih ataupun untuk yang lulus izazah cukup makan atau dipaksa ibu bapa atas dasar dapat pencen. Zaman SSB.

2. Tidak dipandang sangat kerja kerajaan ni. Apa dibuat pun tak dikisah sangat. Penjawat awam dapat bonus pon tak jadi isu besar. Ada juga rungutan sikit-sikit. Sikit sangat. Masing-masing buat hal sendiri. Co exist dalam memajukan Negara.

3. Apabila berlaku kekalutan ekonomi Asia pada penggal dua 1998, ramai yang resah. Ada tekorban dalam jawatan, kerja dan perniagaan. Pedih dan perit menahan rasa. Bil kena bayar, dibuang kerja pula. Dulu taraf yuppie. Sekarang dah taraf yippie bekerja sebagai budak pizza dan sebagainya. Kereta tak terbayar. Dulu sewa rumah sekarang dah tinggal di bawah kolong. Sunggoh tidak selamat Kassim Selamat. Ramai yang mencari kerja baru. Nak dimudahkan kerja, sudah ada perkhidmatan atas talian seperti Jobstreet.com dan jobsdb.com. Jenuh juga mengedit resume dsan mencari scanner untuk menyeken wajah 3R.

4. Yang dilihat bertahan adalah penjawat awam. Tiada exit policy seperti VSS atau sebarang istilah berkaitan. Mereka bekerja. Demi Negara.

5. Pada masa ini, politik pun kacau, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang dilihat mewakili golongan pertengahan 25-40 tahun telah dipecat dari jawatan TPM. Dengan sedikit buat ramai, ramai yang menyebelahi beliau. Yang saheh dan saheh sangat golongan ini lah. Komposisi pelbagai. Namun yang ramai adalah dari golongan pekerja swasta, peniaga, penganggur dan juga penjawat awam yang hairan belas kasih akan DSAI. Kerja problem dan pemimpin pujaan hati dianiaya. Pola sokongan berubah. Pola ini diterjemah secara penuh iltizam, geram dan takzim dalam PRU 2008. Golongan ini pada era reformasi 98 telah menjadi pengasuh kepada anak-anak sekolah dan layak mengundi pada masa itu. Kerajaan? Gayat sudah.

6. Ekonomi sekejap panas, suam, sejuk, pecah peloh dan penuh mimpi. Pejawat awam maseh mengidam bentuk imbuhan. Lama tak merasa bonus. Bila dapat, rakan sejawat di sektor swasta menyindir seperti pak pandir akan wang mudah itu. Dakwa mereka cukai yang dibayar oleh kampeni dasn mereka itu digunakan untuk wang mudah. Dulu kurang bunyi seperti di no 2, sekarang dah kuat bunyi sebab tekanan hidup akan kos semakin naik atas kepala rakan-rakan swasta kerana merek sahaja bekerja. Penjawat awam tak bekerja barangkali. Cuma secara keseluruhan penjawat awam dapat imbuhan wang. Mereka tidak pula sedar ada sebahagian dari mereka dapat makan bonus 3,4,5,6,10,24,dan 36 bulan yang kuat balun kerajaan tapi senyap sunyi balun duit bonus belanja sana sini. Tiada siapa ganggu dalam Negara aman sentosa ini.

7. Gap antara sektor awam dan swasta semakin luas. Dah le ramai tak sokong kerajaan. Dalam kerajaan ramai dah tukar spesis dari homo sapien kepada Vulpes vulpes. Lagi susah. Siap ada sub spesis baru iaitu vulpes gallus domesticus. Susah mengasuh ooooo.

8. Sektor awam pun ramai yang sakit. Ramai yang dilihat under perform. Tiada yang menjadi kisah sangat kalau yang sakit itu dari kakitangan sokongan. Yang menjadi kisah bila ada yang memegang jawatan profesional dan jawatan utama sektor awam (JUSA) yang dilihat tak menepati kehendak stakeholder, masalah disiplin dan purba akalnya. Malah satu blog mendakwa ada hampir 30 JUSA sedang bercuti di Antartika. Benar salah angka itu belakang kira tapi sudah mencipta persepsi betapa tidak efisiennya pelaksana dasar peringkat atas ini. Angka ini masih menjadi tanda Tanya dan bimban dikompang lebih sebagai penyedap cerita. Tapikan, kes-kes seperti PKFZ, Lemu aircond, dan sebagainya takkan nak disalahkan penjawat awam juga? Ahli poliik tak sakit kot?

9. 2009 telah menampakkan keterbukaan kerajaan dalam membuka ruang kepada otak no nonsense swasta menyumbang dalam kerajaan. Macam-macam nama dah keluar seperti PEMANDU, PEREKA, PEMAYAH, PENYUPIR dan segala bagai. Jentera kerajaan sekarang bergerak selaras dengan kehendak zaman. Pantas, no nonsense dan up to date. Aku ada juga mendengar ada setengah situasi bahawa entiti-entiti baru ini buat kerja yang sama dengan agensi pusat atau kemeteria yang berkaitan. Marah juga aku dengar dari penjawat awam kerana selalu usaha mereka dipotong tang kona atau diambil atas pengandaq oleh entiti berkenaan. Mungkin ada sebabnya. Jangan marah. Banyakkan tomakninah dalam amarah. Kita sedang menuju Negara maju.

10. Untuk menjadi maju, kita perlu ada kiblat, ada contoh. Mungkin acuan kita GB atau US. Kerjasama awam–swasta kena dipertingkatkan, usaha meningkat KDNK perlu dilipatganda. Itu pasti. Memajukan dari segi materi. Dari segi jasmani tidak juga ditinggal. Maka untuk kesepaduan usaha itu, NKRA dengan enam tonggak dilancarkan.

11. Enam berkenaan : Mengurangkan jenayah, Memerangi rasuah, Meluaskan akses kepada pendidikan bermutu dan termampu, Meningkatkan taraf hidup isi rumah berpendapatan, Memperkasa prasarana luar bandar dan Menambah baik pengangkutan awam bandar.

12. Dan pada Belanjawan baru-baru ini, akan berlaku perubahan dalam perkhidmatan awam dengan penggantian Skim Saraan Malaysia dengan Sistem Saraan Baru Perkhidmatan Awam. Baru lagi. Masih panas. Dan dah mula panas. Seperti artikel yang aku ambil dari Utusan Malaysia.

13. Dah ramai dari penjawat awam merasa pelik akan artikel berkenaan. Benda dah berstatus saheh dan saheh jadi. Nak dipendekkan cerita, mari kita sama-sama persoalkan persoalan-persoalan ini :

14. 1. Tak kesian ke kepada yang target nak jadi JUSA sampai termimpi-mimpi?

15. 2. Tak kesian ke kepada yang memang layak nak jadi JUSA tapi kouta dah jadi kurang akibat perlaksanaan open post ini? Perlukah perubahan ini berlaku? Tidak ada pula dalam NKRA dsan NKEA?

16. Apa benar, kaedah ini adalah sebahagian daripada mandrem untuk memenangi sektor swasta supaya balik bersama kerajaan dan peduli bersama kerajaan?

17. Walaupun di mana kita bekerja akan ada tangungjawab kerahsiaan tapi dengan kaedah separuh masuk separuh keluar ini akan lebih tiris di sana sini.

18. Mungkinkah perkhidmatan awam akan collapse akan perubahan utama ini kerana akan berlaku conflict pelarasan tugas akibat tidak dapat menafsir pekeliling, TI dan undang-undang perkhidmatan awam yang sarat dengan kuasa Parlimennya?

19. Bimbang akan berlaku hit and run konsep dan wujud elemen membawa pasukan sendiri untuk mengurus kerajaan. Bimbang bila dibawa pasukan sendiri, maka banyak jawatan yang sepatutnya disi akan dipenuhi oleh calon luar. Nah, bukan lagi JUSA sahaja, malah gred 48,52 dan 54 pun akan terlepas atas dasar arahan. Mungkin boleh berlaku.

20. Mungkin ada benar, kita tidak perlu berotak Cold War lagi. Kerja perlu tidak seperti zaman lalu. Jadi nampak tak dapat dielakkan bahawa perlu revamp perkhidmatan awam 159%.

21. Bak kata sahabat pena aku, Nabilah Mahmud iaitu seorang pegawai di PDRM, adalah lebih baik kita apply jobstreet.com balik untuk masuk swasta. By the time profile kita bagus dengan KPI yang hebat di kampeni kita bekerja, mungkin ada peluang nak apply masuk perkhidmatan awam semula. Kalau kena gaya, umur 40 atau 45 tahun dah dapat JUSA A atau Turus 2. Kuasa penting sekarang. Nak kaya melana dok swasta lah.

22. Last soalan : Siapakah JUSA atau Turus yang akan disambung kontrak sebagai orang yang pertama? Kita tunggu… Dan siapakah dari Swasta akan jadi KSU yang pertama. Kita tunggu…

Maseh terlalu awal mengandai tapi mengandai adalah kaedah baik untuk menjaga benda hehadapan ni. Kenapa tak bincang habis-habis dengan segala kerangka perkhidmatan awam. Kumpulan skim, MBJ dan kesatuan. Persatuan yang jaga skim tak bersuara ke? atau kekal dengan gaya hensem dan lawa semacam seperti yang sudah-sudah?